Run Your Own LLM Evaluation
Test any models with your prompts. Start free, no credit card required.
Coding Performance with 10 Evaluators — Run
Comprehensive evaluation of 2 language models across 1 system prompt with rigorous benchmarking and scoring criteria.
6.67
gpt-5.4
5.00
Spread: 3.34 pts
1022ms
Response time
80
8 total responses
Executive Insights
Key takeaways from this evaluation
Top Performer
gpt-5.4
6.67
3.34 pts ahead of #2
Model Rankings
Ranked by overall performance score
gpt-5.4
openai/gpt-5.4
Above Average
Responses
4
Avg Latency
—
Cost
$0.0101
sonar-pro
perplexity/sonar-pro
Needs Improvement
Responses
4
Avg Latency
1022ms
Cost
$0.0127
Evaluator Consensus
How 10 evaluator models ranked the candidates via blind comparison
majority Agreement
7 of 10 evaluators agree on the top model
gpt-5.4
Avg Rank
1.3
Range
#1–2
#1 Votes
7/10
Latency
—
sonar-pro
Avg Rank
1.7
Range
#1–2
#1 Votes
3/10
Latency
1022ms
gpt-5.4-mini
gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview
minimax-m2.7
deepseek-v3.2
grok-4.1-fast
qwen3.5-27b
nova-2-lite-v1
claude-sonnet-4.6
kimi-k2.5
mistral-small-2603
Score Comparison
Visual comparison of all model scores
Performance by System Prompt
How each model performs across different evaluation contexts
Top Performer
gpt-5.4
6.67
Performance by Test Prompt
Model results broken down by individual test prompts
| Test Prompt | Avg Score |
|---|---|
Javascript Function 2 responses | 5.00 |
Write an Interval Merge Function 2 responses | 5.00 |
Debug Python 2 responses | 5.00 |
Refactor Javascript 2 responses | 5.00 |
About This Evaluation
Methodology, criteria weights, and evaluation confidence
8
Total Responses
80
Total Evaluations
